For a fresh start, he must again seek an agreement on the adjustment of the 1967 border, whether the two adversaries negotiate directly with each other or not. According to TFD`s experience, this step requires strong moderation as it can transfer responsibility to individual organizations or actors. This step is about an agreement, not a consensus. By the end of the step, the group should have created a list of possible solutions. Once you know clearly who is really pulling the strings and where the real power base is, who you need to work with, who you need to inform, who you need to seek advice and approval from, you can actually make these big, very, very heavy organizations work very, very well. In line with the enhanced trilateral security partnership called “AUKUS” announced earlier this year, our three governments are conducting an 18-month consultation phase to find an optimal way to deliver nuclear-powered submarines to the Royal Australian Navy as soon as possible. The agreement would allow the three parties to communicate and exchange information on nuclear naval propulsion and would provide for authorization to exchange certain limited data that may be required during trilateral talks, allowing for full and effective consultations. The first phase of TFD`s dialogue process generates a collective commitment to the initiative, builds trust between leaders and refines a collective understanding of the issue. The Advisory Group and the Steering Committee are following the first phase by planning subsequent dialogues as part of the initiative. These dialogues cover the second phase and are structured in such a way as to seek agreement among participants through productive discussions and consultations.

A senior Indian official said India has a legitimate interest because a Chinese “noose” is tightening its friends and trading partners around the South China Sea. China`s maritime fixation underscores the appeal of reducing concerns about its land borders, at least that`s the argument some in Beijing are making for a disputed border deal. All parties should be asked for a new review now, on this side of the election, to look at what can afford and what kind of training and equipment is needed given the new scenario. “For three weeks, the authorities tried to reach an agreement through dialogue,” he said. Neither Republicans nor Democrats, he said, will try to kill a deal that has great potential benefits for both countries. Identifying opportunities to resolve the issues discussed earlier is an important process point for stakeholders involved in the dialogue. These possibilities can work at national or international level and can be implemented by one or all of the actors involved. Through the dialogue process, participants analyze the conditions that cause and underlie the problems. This analysis can be broken down by stakeholder, as different groups or sectors may have different views on the underlying conditions. All solutions must address the underlying causes of fault lines in order for these solutions to be sustainable and effective. From this stage, dialogue participants gain a common understanding of different perspectives on the topic.

This step is often taken before and at the beginning of a dialogue event An HC member, consultant or other relevant stakeholder writes a backgrounder for a dialogue. This document provides local context on the topics and shares information about the issue with participants. It is similar to a scoping document, but focuses on the local context of the global problem to be explored during the dialogue. During the dialogue, participants share their views through field visits and presentations. Field visits give participants insight into each other`s experiences and encourage informal conversations. By exploring the tensions between their lived experiences and worldviews, participants can engage in productive dialogue rather than simply representing their own position. I approved the agreement, approved its execution and called on Congress to consider it favourably. I have noted that by participating in the United States in accordance with international agreements, the United Kingdom and Australia are making substantial and material contributions to mutual defence and security.

The United Kingdom is a party to the North Atlantic Treaty and Australia is a party to the Security Treaty between Australia, New Zealand and the United States. In my opinion, the agreement meets all legal requirements. Once participants understand the local context, the next step is to identify local fault lines and examine those identified from the scope dialogue. This can be done through plenary discussions or focus groups during the dialogue. I am pleased to transmit to Congress, pursuant to section 123d. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2153(d)), the text of an agreement between the Government of the United States of America, the Government of Australia and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the “United Kingdom”) on the exchange of naval information on nuclear propulsion (the “Agreement”). I am also happy to provide them with my written approval, authorization and statement regarding the agreement. The memorandum presented to me by the Minister of Energy, which contains a summary of the agreement, is also attached. For more information about Phase 2 of the TFD process, see the TFD Guide. .